Skip to content

Posts from the ‘politics’ Category

Call to arms

Numerous debates, explanations, and non-explanations have followed the riots that tortured the UK early last week, and from the ashes and ransacked shops, two political positions have formed.

1. That violence and destruction is wrong. It is criminal, and we must fight against the criminals.

2. That violence and destruction is wrong. It is criminal, but we must understand the conditions that led to such criminality.

I don’t have a strong political persuasion other than I prefer to hear the intelligent response, as well as a belief that everyone has a responsibility to the community they live in, whether they are rich, poor or otherwise.

I also feel the UK is let down by the current political parties. Vote Tory, and the rich get richer. Vote Labour, and the poor stay poor. There is no political persuasion, that I know of, currently representing the ordinary citizen who goes out to work every day and is trying to pay their mortgage, support their ageing parents, put their children through University, and enjoy some standard of living. The Liberal’s are not that party. They don’t know where they are.

However, I feel Ed Miliband was right to say that “to explain the riots is not to excuse”, although poorly executed in his wimpish tone, because living in London during the trouble there was a real sense of tension, and not just from the under-classes. The conditions were right for the pot lid to blow, and blow it did. A City without a police commissioner, corruption through government and media, politicians all out of the country, job cuts, service cuts, rich getting richer (no more evident than in London), the middle ever more squeezed, and meanwhile the City is simply told to look forward to the Olympics, as if that makes everything okay. It doesn’t.

And then there is David Cameron; deeply entrenched in political position number one (and often out of the country or hiding behind Nick Clegg); the only position he can take if he wishes to keep his job as Prime Minister. But I have to agree, a PM who says one minute “Everybody deserves a second chance” in response to the criminal investigation involving his former press secretary, to four year sentences for those young people engaged in last weeks riots, many of which were caught up in a wave of adrenalin and peer pressure. I am sorry, but it smacks of double standards.

Boris Johnson was also caught out by not wanting to disrupt his jolly holiday, but I do admire his charisma and intelligence. He is the only leader who has voiced some ideas about putting the wrong right and last night spoke about the introduction of compulsory National Service.

Sadly, I doubt the country would ever be brave enough or organised enough to make such a thing happen, but I think it would be a fantastic thing for all sorts of reasons.

It would become a rite of passage. An experience that defines a culture shared by all. It does not necessarily mean going to war, but contributing to your country, possibly as simple as decorating an old age home or fitting a Naval ship with electronic systems (a little more advanced).

It is suggested that National Service would be a tough sell to the middle classes who might say – “Leave my little Joey alone … he is doing just fine thanks”. But such a challenge would be healthy. It is a challenge to all of us that says success is all about academic achievement and financial wealth. This is a drug we are all high on.

National service would give release to the pressure of success. An opportunity to pause before registering for an expensive University degree. What is the rush? And if we all have to wait a little longer , no one individual can outperform the other.

If a parent does not like the idea of National Service because they do not believe in Britain, then we are rooting out the problem. Such attitudes bread disrespect. Compulsory National Service would surely challenge this.

Also, and as a 30 something ushered through the system of education, university and professional life, I would give just about anything to know a skill. To know how to hang wallpaper, to wire a house, to build a wall, to make a go-kart. I would save a lot of money by knowing a few basic trades, and perhaps be less inclined to throw out and buy new – even the environment is saved!

Or is it simply a call to arms for all of us?

Optimism over Fear

Today is an historic day as Queen Elizabeth II becomes the first British monarch to visit Ireland for over a century.

The border between Ireland and Britain is no longer a line drawn on the battle field but a point where families and friends cross to see one another. Our lives and loves mixed together.

Paradoxically todays scenes of pomp and pageantry belong to the people. It is they who have suffered. It is they who have lived their history, and it is they that have chosen a future away from violence.

It is a reinvention of the role of the state, where once governments were good for war, but poor for peace, they must now cement the call to peace so demanded by their people.

I was, though, a little sad this morning when I told my fiancee to take care in London. “Be vigilant”, I said, following a number of credible bomb threats. Meanwhile in Dublin, a viable pipe bomb was found in the luggage compartment of a bus.

Threats of terror in London. Threats of terror in Dublin. None of it makes any sense. Just one detonated device would shatter families interwoven across Britain and Ireland. There is no target. No agenda that can be served through the murder of the innocent.

Violence and conflict scars our past. It should play no role today or any day in the future.

It is right that there are disagreements and many would say that Ireland should not welcome a Head of State that occupies nine of its counties, but its political state is now one of inclusion over division and its differences unravelled through communication and debate.

It is also true that Ireland and Britain will always have differences, as both countries do with other like nations (next visit The USA and President Obama), but what binds us is greater, and together we will achieve more. Events of this kind, as costly as they are, must surely cement that optimism.

As I step into London this evening, an Irish descendant, it is this optimism that I look to carry and not the fear I confronted this morning.

What creates an Anti-Social Society?

No Camping

No Dogs

No Ball Games

Say No To Strangers

No Litter please

“Is it any surprise that we live in an Anti-Social society?”

These were the words offered by Wayne Hemingway, founder of Red and Dead, at a sterling Design Event held in London recently.

“In a green, open area, why are we banning all those things that should be taking place? Apart from litter, we should be promoting camping and ball games – there aren’t any windows in this photograph too smash! … And why not talk to strangers – this is an ideal social setting to meet new people and chat about the day”.

To see this talk in its entirety please visit Enabled By Design blog site or click on the video below.

Film produced by Martin Cahill.

If you would like to record your event or speaker please send a short email to mcahill@gmail.com.

Ten Pence Worth – British Election 2010

I am no political analyst, and more often than not I am wrong.

The days that followed the election, I believed, were bad for democracy. The power had once again been snatched from the electorate. It was no longer the voter who would determine the colour of our political picture.

Today, I think I was wrong. The ballot box said that we were dismayed (maybe worse) with Labour, did not yet trust the Tories, and were unwilling or unable to back the Lib Dems. The result said no to them all and no to politics in its current form.

The result: A Conservative/ Lib Dem coalition.

Sitting back for a moment we might suggest that democracy has been served. A Labour/ Lib Dem coalition was in all sense and purposes mathematically impossible.

We now have a situation where right must work with left, and left must work with right. For the first time since many of us can remember, politicians must now talk and determine the best, most intelligent response to each of the challenges facing Britain and the world today.

Potentially, we could have the best of both worlds – a strong Britain, a Britain open for business (Conservatives), and also a Britain with a very real social conscience (Lib Dems).

How long this form of politics will last is anybody’s guess, probably no longer than the current calendar month, hence an agreement to last a full term.

For Labour, I think they are playing an interesting game. By holding back on a natural alliance, they will likely try and position themselves as the only alternative form of government, and when the coalition collapses, and it will, I suspect they will aim to be ready with a shiny, all new leader. An all new Labour.

Enter stage centre – David Milliband.

This all sounds a little familiar, but who is writing the script, the politicians or the electorate?

14 Steps to Electoral Victory

This is a terrific story. Sarah Wakefield has been elected University of Manchester’s General Secretary for 2010-2011. Sarah has also recorded the highest majority since records started in 1967.

How did she do that?

First and foremost, Sarah is an engaging, intelligent, and bubbly member of the Manchester student community. She works incredibly hard, maintaining a list of activities that would put most high-earning executives to shame. Her policies were also clear, well articulated, and perhaps most distinctly, they were progressive. Sarah’s manifesto makes a call to arms to protect the quality of education, for online votes to be made during general meetings, and for greater transparency by placing administrative processes online, not to mention a commitment to spending at least two hours a week outside of the union engaging with students.

What else did she do?

She has also achieved what every political hopeful is trying to do around the world. She has captured the magic that illuminated Obama’s campaign through the medium of online video, blogs and social networks. In the 14 days running up to the student election Sarah posted a short online video to her blog sarahwakefield.com – 14 in all. This collection of short videos walks us through her manifesto pledges critically placing the message in the environmental context that it was made – the union, oxford road, and even the pub. Her voice is real, her message is heart-felt. One by one the students of Manchester get to know Sarah and trust her message. If not, they can write to her and express their opinion.

Sarah’s blog outlines her policies, activities and testimonials, all giving a real-sense of Sarah Wakefield and what a voter might expect from her, and also what she asks of the voter. Social networking tools are at play also – twitter and facebook. Sarah is connected to over 800 friends, and regularly posted events and meetups online. According to her testimonial “Sarah Wakefield has persuaded some of the most cynical people to walk through its doors of its importance”.

Students voted online.

This was a well-executed campaign. Technology was part of the story, but only part. In the end, a talented individual won the trust of her peers and for that we offer our congratulations. I certainly wish Sarah all the best during her time as General Secretary 2010-2011.

I hope to hold an informal interview with Sarah when I return to Manchester. As the world rethinks the nature of politics and democracy in the 21st Century, Sarah’s story holds an important line in history.

If Sarah is reading this, I hope you agree.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.